Leaders. Experts. Advocates.
For over 25 years, we have been leaders in employment, labor, civil rights, aviation, and ethics law. We focus on complex cases, including class actions, professional licensing, malpractice, and serious personal injury claims. Our brainpower, problem-solving skills, and fierce devotion to clients make us advocates you can count on.
Johnson, Webbert & Young, LLP is pleased to announce that three of the firm’s lawyers – all of the firm’s partners – were selected for inclusion in the 2016 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©, one of the legal profession’s oldest and most respected peer-review publications.
Best Lawyers ® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Lawyers are selected for The Best Lawyers in America through an exhaustive peer review process in which lawyers confidentially evaluate their legal peers. Over 79,000 leading attorneys globally are eligible to vote. For 2016, 6.7 million votes were analyzed.
The following attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America for 2016:
Phillip E. Johnson
Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law
Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants
Legal Malpractice Law – Plaintiffs
David G. Webbert
Employment Law – Individuals
Jeffrey N. Young
Employment Law – Individuals
Our Firm in the News:
Settlement hearing set for suit over alleged assaults in Brunswick school
The next phase of a lengthy legal dispute between the Brunswick school system and the family of a former student who allegedly was sexually and physically assaulted at Brunswick Junior High School will likely play out on Aug. 18 in federal court.
The family of the former student, identified as Jack Doe, and the Maine Human Rights Commission filed a lawsuit in federal court charging the town, school department and junior high principal with violating his civil rights. In addition to alleging that the former student was sexually and physically assaulted, the lawsuit claims he was discriminated against based on his gender and sexual orientation while attending the school from 2010 to 2012.
The suit, filed in July 2015, names the Brunswick School Department, town of Brunswick and Brunswick Junior High School Principal Walter Wallace as defendants. It charges that Wallace acted “with actual malice and reckless indifference to federally protected rights of Jane Doe and her child” and failed to adequately respond to the student’s repeated complaints and charges of assault, discrimination and bullying.
The suit alleges that over a period of 2½ years “a group of sexually aggressive and violent male students” harassed the student, called him “gay,” subjected him to several “gay tests,” struck him with a lacrosse stick, stabbed him with a pencil and on three separate occasions sexually assaulted him, then threatened him and his family if he told anyone about the assaults.
An attorney representing the family said by phone this week that information collected since the suit was filed strengthens the case against the town and school department.
In June 2014, the Maine Human Rights Commission voted to uphold its investigator’s report substantiating the complaints and subsequently joined the suit as a plaintiff “to ensure that Brunswick has in place effective measures to prevent a hostile education environment based on sex and sexual orientation,” according to court documents.
Many case documents have been sealed after both parties in December 2015 signed a confidentiality agreement.
Webbert wrote that Wallace allegedly told Jack Doe’s father when he was in seventh grade that junior high kids “are like a wolfpack and they tend to pick on the weak, and I think this is what’s going on with your kid, and maybe you should ask him to tone down his individuality a little bit.”
Webbert wrote that Wallace’s “minimal and belated” responses “were clearly unreasonable in the face of numerous reports of longtime and escalating verbal harassment and physical abuse of Jack by multiple male students,” including being made fun of for being gay more than 30 different times, hit and stuck with a push pin.
Webbert said Wallace admitted in a deposition before the human rights commission that the school’s response to the push pin incident was “in violation of the procedure” for bullying incidents and said Superintendent Paul Perzanoski admitted at his deposition that a written report should have been created.
Webbert said Jack Doe was still enrolled at the school and attending classes “sporadically” when he made the allegations in October 2012 and was subsequently tutored at home.
“We think this case is so strong for us on certain issues, and it’s gotten stronger,” Webbert said.
A mediator will join Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison and attorneys for the two parties at the Aug. 18 conference, Webbert said.
House Speaker Mark Eves filed an amended lawsuit Friday against Gov. Paul LePage, further accusing the chief executive of violating his rights in the Good Will-Hinckley school hiring controversy.
. . . . . . . .
Eves’ attorney, David Webbert, said he expects from his prior discussion with LePage’s attorney in the case, Patrick Strawbridge, that the governor will first file a motion to dismiss one or both counts in the lawsuit before answering the individual factual claims in the complaint.
“It is a little different from the first one because we know the facts better,” Webbert said. “It is pretty much the governor’s own words. The case pretty much stands on his own statements.”
Webbert said that if LePage files a motion or motions to dismiss, that almost guarantees the case couldn’t reach trial before 2017.
“If he wants it to go quickly, he would file an answer. If he wants it done in 2016, that’s what he would do. The federal courts in Maine move pretty quickly,” Webbert said.
. . . . . . . .
Webbert said he took extra lengths in the amended complaint to explain why he feels federal court is the proper venue to settle Eves’ dispute with the governor. The case involves different branches of government and would affect more people than other civil disputes involving just a few individuals, he said.
“This case transcends Mark Eves. It really is an important case for all of Maine,” Webbert said.
. . . . . . . .
A lawsuit filed by a black nurse who says she was taunted on a daily basis while working at the Maine State Prison can proceed, a federal judge has ruled.
Cannell’s attorney David Webbert said Tuesday the ruling was an important one, since there has been a trend in the workplace for companies to subcontract work and then deny responsibility when discrimination occurs.
He said the prison has a poor track record and is behind the times in treatment of blacks and women in the workplace.
“I think it is pretty clear they violated the law,” said Allison Gray, a human rights attorney from Johnson Webbert and Young in Augusta, which represents Thomas.
On Thursday, Gray said that unlike what happens in many other investigations, Beauchesne did not hold conferences with the parties and only used their initial filings to make his investigative decisions.
That is “a sign of the strength of our case” and Pan Am’s liability, Gray said.
House Speaker Mark Eves addresses reporters during a press conference July 30 outside the U.S. District Court in Portland. Eves and David Webbert (right), his attorney, filed a lawsuit against Gov. Paul LePage accusing him of blackmailing Good Will-Hinckley. Laura Eves (left), Mark Eves’ wife, looks on.
LePage can use up to $400,000 for private attorney to fight Eves lawsuit.
Agganis’ lawyer Allison Gray says her client will file suit in federal court this week against T-Mobile, alleging that the company subjected her to a hostile work environment based on her gender.
“What we feel is she should have been taken seriously, and instead she was silenced,” Gray says. “And that practice violates her civil rights.”
Agganis says she’s bringing suit, in part, to be a voice for those who may not feel empowered to do so.
That language adds uncertainty to the law, said David Webbert of the law firm Johnson, Webbert & Young, which specializes in employment issues. He said “primarily” has been defined as 50 percent-plus. But “substantially” is less clear, Webbert said, so opponents may turn to the courts for a definition.
Former employee Angela Agganis says she was touched inappropriately by a call center supervisor.
Angela Agganis of Waterville filed a complaint Oct. 9 in U.S. District Court in Portland, accusing the company of subjecting her to a hostile work environment based on her sex. She is represented by Allison Gray, a civil rights attorney with Johnson, Webbert and Young in Augusta.